![]() |
NOTE: This is a PREVIOUS VERSION. A more current version of this document is available. Contractor InformationContractor Name:Highmark Medicare Services Contractor Number:12102, 12202, 12302 Contractor Type:MAC Part A & B LCD InformationLCD Database ID NumberL27520 LCD TitleReal-Time, Outpatient Cardiac Monitoring Contractor’s Determination NumberL27520 AMA CPT/ADA CDT Copyright StatementCPT codes, descriptions and other data only are copyright 2007 American Medical Association (or such other date of publication of CPT). All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Clauses Apply. Current Dental Terminology, (CDT) (including procedure codes, nomenclature, descriptors and other data contained therein) is copyright by the American Dental Association. © 2002, 2004 American Dental Association. All rights reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS apply. CMS National Coverage PolicyTitle XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(1)(A) states that no Medicare payment shall be made for items or services which are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury. Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(7). This section excludes routine physical examinations. Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1833(e) states that no payment shall be made to any provider for any claim that lacks the necessary information to process the claim. CMS Online Manual Pub. 100-4, Chapter 15, Section 10.4.3 Primary Geographic JurisdictionMaryland, District of Columbia, Delaware Oversight RegionCentral Office Original Determination Effective DateFor services performed on or after 07/11/2008 Original Determination Ending DateN/A Revision Effective DateFor services performed on or after N/A Revision Ending DateN/A Indications and Limitations of Coverage and/or Medical NecessityCompliance with the provisions in this policy may be monitored and addressed through post payment data analysis and subsequent medical review audits. Real-time, outpatient cardiac monitoring is an automatically activated system that requires no patient intervention to either capture or transmit an arrhythmia when it occurs. Upon arrhythmia detection, the device utilizes the standard telephone line or wireless communications and transmits the ECG waveform to the receiving center. The patient's physician is made aware of arrhythmias based on pre-determined notification criteria, tailored to the patient by the physician. In this system, the patient wears a small telemetry transmitter that sends the ECG to the computer with modem where the real-time analysis occurs. When the ECG violates certain alarm limits, the ECG strip is automatically sent to the receiving center via the computer modem or wireless communication. The receiving center also has the capability to receive and review a patient's ECG strip in real-time, at any time during the episode of monitoring. Qualified technicians perform ECG surveillance 24 hours a day. The patient's physician is notified of ECG abnormalities based on the notification criteria. This rapid arrhythmia recognition and physician notification allows timely intervention. In addition, this system provides an analysis and report of 24 hours of monitoring, similar to Holter studies. Therefore, the concomitant use of cardiac surveillance, Holter monitoring, and /or event monitoring would not be necessary. Covered Indications At this time, Medicare coverage for this service is limited to a very select patient population who have demonstrated a need for cardiac monitoring, and for whom all the following pertain:
Real-time, outpatient cardiac monitoring may be indicated for the following patients who have demonstrated a need for cardiac monitoring (and meet the above requirements):
Coverage Limitations Real-time, outpatient cardiac monitoring is contraindicated for use in patients at high risk of developing sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation and would be more appropriately cared for in a hospital setting. This service is not indicated for all patients with arrhythmias. It should be used only in circumstances where traditional Holter monitoring or cardiac event recording is not expected to provide adequate information or has been unrevealing. In addition, this system is NOT for patients with mild to moderate symptoms of "palpitations" or "weakness". This system is also NOT indicated for use as a screening tool. Use of cardiac surveillance and Holter or event monitoring for the same patient on the same day is not medically necessary. Coverage TopicDiagnostic Tests and X-Rays Coding InformationBill Type CodesContractors may specify Bill Types to help providers identify those Bill Types typically used to report this service. Absence of a Bill Type does not guarantee that the policy does not apply to that Bill Type. Complete absence of all Bill Types indicates that coverage is not influenced by Bill Type and the policy should be assumed to apply equally to all claims.
Revenue CodesContractors may specify Revenue Codes to help providers identify those Revenue Codes typically used to report this service. In most instances Revenue Codes are purely advisory; unless specified in the policy services reported under other Revenue Codes are equally subject to this coverage determination. Complete absence of all Revenue Codes indicates that coverage is not influenced by Revenue Code and the policy should be assumed to apply equally to all Revenue Codes.
CPT/HCPCS CodesItalicized and/or quoted material is excerpted from the American Medical Association, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes.
ICD-9 Codes that Support Medical NecessityIt is the provider’s responsibility to select codes carried out to the highest level of specificity and selected from the ICD-9-CM code book appropriate to the year in which the service is rendered for the claim(s) submitted.
Diagnoses that Support Medical NecessityN/A ICD-9 Codes that DO NOT Support Medical NecessityAll those not listed under the “ICD-9 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of this policy. ICD-9 Codes that DO NOT Support Medical Necessity Asterisk ExplanationDiagnoses that DO NOT Support Medical NecessityConditions that are not listed in the "ICD-9-CM Codes that Support Medical Necessity" section of this policy. General InformationDocumentation Requirements
Utilization GuidelinesIn accordance with CMS Ruling 95-1 (V), utilization of these services should be consistent with locally acceptable standards of practice. This monitoring is expected to not be reported more than once in a 30 day period. Claims reporting more than one monitoring episode in a 30 day period are subject to denial. This monitoring service is expected to not be reported more than twice in a twelve month period. Claims reporting more than two monitoring episodes in a twelve month period are subject to denial. The cardiac problems experienced by patients receiving this service, and the potential sequelae or complications of these problems, may be very intricate and complex. In order to ensure quality of care to the Medicare beneficiaries receiving this service, this service should be ordered and interpreted by providers with experience in caring for these types of patients. These providers should also possess a thorough knowledge of the patient receiving the service. As always, concerns or issues uncovered by this contractor will be referred to the appropriate Medicare Quality Improvement Organization. For services provided by an independent diagnostic testing facility (IDTF): The procedure must be performed under the general supervision of a physician specializing in cardiology or internal medicine. In general supervision, the procedure is furnished under the physician’s overall direction and control, but the physician’s presence is not required during the performance of the procedure. Under general supervision, the training of the nonphysician personnel who actually perform the diagnostic procedure and the maintenance of the necessary equipment and supplies, is the continuing responsibility of the physician. National or state-level training and certification requirements for nonphysician personnel include:
Sources of Information and Basis for DecisionSteven A. Rothman, MD, James C. Laughlin, MD, Jonathan Seltzer, MD, Jasjit S. Walia MBBS, Rakesh I. Baman, MD, Samen Y. Siouffi, MD. Robert M. Sangrigoli, MD, and Peter R. Kowey, MD; "The Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Study Comparing Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Versus Standard Loop Event Monitoring." Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Volume 18, No. 3, March 2007. Eric N. Prystowsky, MD; "Assessment of Rhythm and Rate Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation." Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Volume 17, No. 9, Supplement, September 2006. Jeffrey A. Olson, D.O., Andrew M. Fouts, MD, Benzy J. Padanilam, MD and Eric N. Prystowsky, MD; "Utility of Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry for the Diagnosis of Palpitations, Presyncope, Syncope, and the Assessment of Therapy Efficacy." Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Online March 2007. Ajay K. Joshi MD, Peter R. Kowey MD, Eric N Prystowsky MD, David Benditt MD, David S. Cannom MD, Caraig M. Pratt MD, Anna Mc Namara RN, Robert M. Sangrigoli MD; 'First Experience with a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MCOT) System for the diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Arrhythmia.' American Journal of Cardiology, Volume 95, Issue 7, April 2005. Elizabeth V Saarel MD, Richard Sierba MD, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland OH; 'Initial Experience with a Novel Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry System for Pediatric Patients with Suspected Arrhythmia.' Heart Rhythm 2005 Scientific Sessions. Chandrasekhar R Vasamreddy, Darshan Dalal, Vinod Jayan, Zayd Eldadah, Tim Dickfeld, Jun Dong, Charles Henrickson, Glenn Meininger, Ronald Berger, Hugh Calkins, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD; 'Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.' ACC Annual Scientific Sessions 2005 Khaldoun G. Tarakji MD, Andrea Natale MD, Oussama Wazni MD, Bev Foxhall, Jennifer Cummungs, MD, William Belden, MD and Nassir Marrrouche MD, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland OH; 'Incidence of Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Post Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Novel Continuous Event Monitoring System'. Heart Rhythm 2005 Scientific Sessions. Consultants in cardiology Cardiac Telecom Corporation information CardioNet, Incorporated information FDA approval of HeartLink II (Arrhythmia Detector and Alarm System) FDA approval of CardioNet Ambulatory ECG Monitor with Arrhythmia Detection Kowey PR, et al. ‘First Experience with a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MCOT) System for the Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Arrhythmia.’ NASPE Heart Rhythm Society 24th Annual Scientific Sessions. May 2003. Other Contractors’ Policies Highmark Medicare Services Contractor Medical Directors
Advisory Committee Meeting NotesThis policy does not reflect the sole opinion of the contractor or Contractor Medical Directors. Although the final decision rests with the contractor, this policy was developed in cooperation with advisory groups which includes representatives from General Surgery, Cardiology, Family Practice and Emergency Medicine. CAC/IAC Distribution: 04/01/2008 Start Date of Comment Period04/01/2008
End Date of Comment Period:05/15/2008 Start Date of Notice Period05/23/2008 Revision HistoryRevision History NumberL27520 Revision History Explanation
Last Reviewed On05/22/2008 Related DocumentsThis LCD has no Related Docuemts. LCD AttachmentsThere are no attachments for this LCD. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2005-2008. All rights are reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||